On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the > > effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded? > > If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs?
Only if they were statically linked - I doubt that's the case. But the reason for the list was to make it easier for the buildd maintainer to know which packages with previously failed builds could be requeued. > The > only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the > glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Bad<tm>. Yeah, hopefully that doesn't happen. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
