* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060409 19:09]: > * Reinhard Tartler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060409 19:02]: > > Openal has been split into libopenal and freealut. because of this, the > > binary backage name had to be renamed in order to ensure that all > > depending packages are rebuilt. > > > > openal is now in unstable over 3 weeks, and we have no RC bug reports on > > it. It currently FTBFS on m86k with an gcc ICE, but AFAIK m86k isn't a > > release arch on the one hand, and on the other hand, I cannot imagine > > ANY user wanting it for that arch. > > > > Releaseteam, could you please hint openal and freealut into testing, > > removing all reverse depends? they have to be rebuilt. > > Well, not all. I hintend them a bit in (let's see how itlooks tomorrow).
Can you please rebuild some more of the reverse dependencies first? I think it's not really ok to remove most rdeps from a package from testing, when they could be just rebuild in time in unstable. Please rebuild flightgear, torcs and chromium. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
