On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:13:31AM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2006-04-21, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unfortunately not. The candidate set of affected packages is "all packages > > which transitively build-depend on libxrender-dev or libxcursor-dev and ship > >=2Ela files". A very irritating set to calculate...
> I have now on my machine sort of 'calculated' a part of the set: > /usr/lib$ grep -l libX *.la | xargs dpkg -S | sed 's/:.*//' | sort | uniq > artsbuilder > atlantik > cervisia > gwenview > kaffeine > kbiff > kchart > kdebase-dev > kdevelop3 > kfaxview > kolf > kommander > kspy > kugar > kunittest > kvoctrain > kweather > kwifimanager > kwin-baghira > libarts1-mpeglib > libk3b2 > libkdegames-dev > libkonq4-dev > libkscan1 And many of these are false-positives, because they either don't ship the .so files that the .la files correspond to, or they don't ship any headers that let you make use of those .so's. IOW, they're not shared libraries, they're just plugins of one sort or another, so they don't have any bearing on the current build failure problems. The other thing a list like this doesn't give us is ordering; we need to know for each package which of its build-dependencies also have the problem before I can reasonably queue rebuilds. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
