Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Have we already gotten rid of db4.3? That's a better place to start >> than getting rid of db4.2, as db4.3 had serious issues and at least >> some of the packages linked against db4.2 were doing that specifically >> to avoid db4.3. db4.3 had serious issues with OpenLDAP in particular >> and the OpenLDAP developers recommended avoiding that release entirely.
> Had the OpenLDAP developers ever been able to substantiate any of their > claims? Was there actually any debate over the problems with disabling transaction logging on db4.3 which led to extremely slow performance with slapadd? I thought everyone agreed on that. That's the largest and most noticable issue. Quanah's reported other problems as well in edge cases. It's a moot point at this point since db4.4 is out and (suitably patched) will work fine for OpenLDAP. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
