On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > >> - traditionally weak with keeping up, but currently in good shape > > I don't agree that http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png > > shows it "in good shape". We can expect the build load to get worse, not > > better, with a push for the release... > Those stats are and have been off for a long time. For example there > are 60 packages in state Not-For-Us. That lowers the build percentage > for m68k by nearly one percent alone. Ah, given that one of the m68k porters has commit access to P-a-s, could someone please sort through these N-F-U packages and get them into P-a-s as appropriate so that we can have good data for this architecture instead of having to look at other graphs? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
