On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:08:48PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:33:34PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:58:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So despite having been removed from unstable, it still has a > > > reverse-dependency that blocks its removal from testing. It'd be great if > > > you could check with the maintainer to confirm what should really be > > > happening here.
> Well I reported bug #372106 about gngeogui being uninstallable in sid. > > The new gngeo package was rejected from NEW and then removed from the > > archive some days ago. I have discussed about that with Julien (since > > I'm his sponsor), and he will probably have to ask for removal of > > gngeogui from the archive too, since gngeo seems to be finally not > > distributable even in non-free. > In that case it is probably best to hint both gngeo and gngeogui for > removal from testing at once ? Seeing bug #354571, I agree. I've hinted gngeogui out of testing, which will free up gngeo to be removed automatically by britney. gngeogui will still be in unstable, pending a separate removal request to ftp.debian.org or a fix for the gngeo licensing problems by the maintainer. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
