Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:40:00 +0000
with message-id <034189af-57db-245e-f359-c46a392e9...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
has caused the Debian Bug report #859255,
regarding binNMU needed for more R packages.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
859255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Hello again,
as a follow-up to #858183, I looked at which other R Bioconductor
packages were broken by R 3.3.3-1, and it seems that the previous round
of binNMUs did not repair some of them.
Can you make the followig binNMUs ?
nmu r-bioc-rsamtools_1.26.1-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
nmu r-bioc-shortread_1.32.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
nmu r-bioc-variantannotation_1.20.2-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
nmu r-bioc-genomicalignments_1.10.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
Note to debian-science: there are also R CRAN packages that fail with R
3.3.3, (r-cran-lubridate, r-cran-spam), but I am not yet sure if a
binNMU is enough.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Charles Plessy:
> Le Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:24:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>>
>> as a follow-up to #858183, I looked at which other R Bioconductor
>> packages were broken by R 3.3.3-1, and it seems that the previous round
>> of binNMUs did not repair some of them.
>
>> nmu r-bioc-rsamtools_1.26.1-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
>> nmu r-bioc-shortread_1.32.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
>> nmu r-bioc-variantannotation_1.20.2-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
>> nmu r-bioc-genomicalignments_1.10.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3."
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a friendly ping as I did not get an answer for more than a week.
>
> The reason why I asked for NMUs instead of rebuilding myself is that I
> was under the impression that it would be the solution that is the
> easiest for you, since there are no source diffs to inspect with the NMUs.
> But if you prefer the other way, please let me know !
>
> Have a nice day,
>
Scheduled, thanks.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
