Charles Plessy: > Le Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:25:23PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : >> >> Actually the rebuild was not enough and today I finally understood that >> r-bioc-xvector also needs a rebuild (despite its own regression tests >> did not fail). Unfortunately R in Sid is now ahead of Testing, and the >> Debian build system that we use will force a dependency on Sid's version >> if it goes on the usuall buildds. >> >> Is it possible to binNMU in Testing, or shall I upload a source update to >> testing-proposed-updates ? > > Hello Niels and everybody, > > I just uploaded r-bioc-xvector to testing-proposed-updates. I checked > in a clean chroot that the amd64 package that I built resolves the > breakage of its downstream dependency r-bioc-rsamtools (whose autopkg > tests fail with the current r-bioc-xvector). > > Cheers, > > Charles >
Hi Charles, Thanks for following up on this issue. We need unstable to have higher version than testing. Therefore we cannot use the tpu upload (as-is) because it would violate that rule. I will try to solve this with some binNMU magic. Failing that, we will need an upload of r-bioc-xvector to ensure that the versions align correctly. I will be in touch. :) Thanks, ~Niels
