On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:35:17PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]: > > > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14 > > > days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation > > > and patch by the maintainer. But there is no reaction of any kind by the > > > security team.
> > > Can you please clarify your policy regarding regressions in security > > > updates? In my opinion a second update should be issued as soon as > > > possible. > > >From the stable release team's perspective, that is correct. Fixing > > libtiff is a precondition for the next stable pointrelease, sarge r3. > An upload was made by Steve Langasek on Jun 26 and should be released > soon. Seems to be a /different/ regression, the fix I uploaded was for libfreetype6 rather than for libtiff. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
