Mike Hommey wrote: [snip] > The problem here is that the buildd in question is running a 64bit > kernel while building 32bit binaries. The same problem would happen if > building i386 binaries on amd64 buildds. Now my question is: could these > bugs be treated ignore-etch ? It's indeed RC, but is it release blocker > that all packages in etch can be built this way ? If it is the case, > someone with an amd64 or a sparc64 or anything that can do bi-arch > should try to build the whole archive to find those packages that have > the problem.
FWIW, Martin Michlmayr did that a while ago on a mips64 machine, with surprisingly few problems showing up. OTOH, there's always the workaround of building with linux32. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
