* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060726 18:07]: > also sprach Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]: > > While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting > > binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure > > package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped > > accepting signed binary packages. > > Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with > signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that > this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in > Mexico.
Can we please drop that part on the -release-list? Though I'm personally like that very much, it is not even near being a release goal, less a release blocker. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
