On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2006-07-31 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > >> On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] > >> Could you please schedule a +b2 binNMU for amd64 and s390? These two > >> archs had an old +b1 binNMU and where not rebuilt. (I'll try to > >> provide this kind of information when I request a rebuild next time.)
> > Queued now. > Built and uploaded, now. ;-) > In which form would I need to provide NMU requests to generate as > little work for you as possible? Is this ok, or is their another > representation you'd favour (perhaps you need the complete Debian > version for example)? > --------------- > gsasl (amd64 and s390 +b1, all archs except s390 need a rebuild.) > --------------- > thanks, cu andreas The ideal form would be [package]_[source-version], [reason], [binNMU number], [list of archs] repeated for each (package,binNMU number) tuple. I've queued the gsasl binNMUs now. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
