For the record, I generated https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/binNMUs-golang.txt and pochu scheduled them to address the immediate need.
In the long run, pochu mentioned we should have a consumer for lists such as the above which would automatically schedule the builds. This sidesteps the wanna-build access question. On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay, > > On 11/02/18 14:28, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Philipp Kern <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 02/10/2018 09:26 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 20:45:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 30/01/18 08:54, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >>>>> This would also be very helpful for fixing security issue #888777. > >>>> > >>>> You need to talk to the wanna-build team if you want to be able to > >> schedule > >>>> binNMUs for your language rebuilds, just like the ocaml and haskell > >> teams do. > >>>> > >>> FWIW I disagree, I think this is something the wanna-build team has > >>> essentially delegated to release, so getting people on board is a > shared > >>> thing between those two teams rather than solely a w-b thing. It > >>> happens once every few years though so there isn't really a process to > >>> vet people. > >> > >> So can we have an opinion on the current proposal, which is a single DD > >> (stapelberg)? As far as I know DSA's ticket is currently blocked on > this. > >> > > > > nit: there’s no blocked ticket, but rather, once debian-release is okay > > with the proposal, someone would need to file a ticket on my behalf. See > my > > other reply upthread: > > > >> Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should > > give their okay before the PostgreSQL account can be created. This should > > be done by way of the release team filing the Debian RT ticket on my > > behalf, preferable as an inline signed email. > > > > If I understand https://www.debian.org/intro/organization correctly, > > then pochu@ should be able to make this call. Given that no objections > have > > been voiced by anyone involved within the last two weeks since I asked > for > > access, may I suggest to go ahead? Thank you! > > As I said on IRC: please provide an automated list of required binNMUs, > like the > haskell one, so that if at some point you can't handle them for some time, > others (e.g. me) can easily schedule them. > > Emilio > -- Best regards, Michael
