On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon. > > Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main > > considerations are: 1) please wait for the python 2.4 transition to complete > > first, 2) please try to check whether this new upstream version includes any > > regressions in the set of architectures supported for native compiling. The > > latter has happened before in the past, and it would be unpleasant to have > > to deal with such a transition at this point in the release cycle.
> OCaml 3.09.3 has been released on September 15th. > We, debian ocamlers, feel ready for the new transitions. Regarding your > points: (1) should be done by now (I see the same version of python in > both testing and unstable), (2) should not be a problem for this release > of ocaml which is only a bug fix release. Regarding the possible issue > of more strict toolchains, a problem we encountered in the past, we > uploaded ocaml 3.09.3rc1 to unstable and it has been successfully built > on i386, amd64, sparc and kfreebds-i386 by the experimental building > network. > I hereby ask for permission to go ahead with the 3.09.3 transition, > starting to upload the ocaml package to unstable. Reaffirming my comments on IRC, yes, you have permission to go ahead with this transition. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
