On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 19:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > As we're getting very close to the EOL point release for jessie (at > least from the main archive perspective), I've been having a look at > making the delta from the security archive as small as possible > beforehand. > > Packages not synced to ftp-master > ================================= > > I've added notes where I'm aware of reasons for the missing sync. I > think this set will all need ftp-master investigation / resolution. > > * enigmail 2:1.9.9-1~deb8u1 (source + all) > * freerdp 1.1.0~git20140921.1.440916e+dfsg1-4+deb8u1 (source + > binaries) > * mat 0.5.2-3+deb8u1 (source + all) > - This was originally uploaded to ftp-master, rejected, and re- > uploaded to security "as-is", so failed the replay check on ftp- > master > * openjdk-7 7u171-2.6.13-1~deb8u1 (source + binaries) > - I think this may have been a case where the binary uploads were > processed before the source. I suspect that on re-processing some > architectures may have issues with version constraints, but getting > as many incorporated as possible would be appreciated. >
As discussed on IRC, the latest version from the security archive failed to get synced to ftp-master, because there are older openjdk-7 binaries in experimental (due to an apparently expected FTBFS with newer uploads), and (o)pu have a "must be older than experimental" version constraint. Ansgar indicated (again on IRC) that he thought the constraints could be dropped in this case. > * openoffice.org-dictionaries 1:3.3.0~rc10-4+deb8u1 (source + all) > - I think this is due to some of the binaries (e.g. hunspell-fr) > being produced by other source packages with higher versions > * procps > - appears to have had some sort of upload error > 20180610173424|process-upload|dak|procps_3.3.9- > 9+deb8u1_armhf.changes|Error while loading changes: No valid > signature found. (GPG exited with status code 512) That's still the case. > > Packages not available on -security > =================================== > > Is it worth retrying any of these? There's one new package to add to the list: * memcached 1.4.21-1.1+deb8u2 (ppc64el) I tried giving this back a short while ago and it failed again. Could someone possibly check the log to see if it's likely to be a fatal issue? Cheers, Adam
