Hi, On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 18:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > "Adam D. Barratt" writes: [...] > > I assume something (relevant) has changed in the past year or so, > > as openoffice.org-dictionaries managed to get accepted this time. > > It looks like the original issue was what I thought, however: > > > > hunspell-fr | 1:3.3.0-4+deb8u1 | oldstable-proposed-updates | all > > hunspell-fr | 1:5.2-1 | oldstable | > > source, all > > I temporarily disabled the version check (o-p-u > oldstable) to get > this in o-p-u.
Ah, that explains it - thanks! > > Is that likely to cause an issue on point release day, or should we > > simply end up with jessie containing both binaries temporarily, > > with > > the "older" one getting dominated away? > > I guess dominate should just get rid of the lower versioned package. > That's what I was hoping, I just wanted to check now rather than on point release day. Regards, Adam