Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:33:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> I think a hint for libofx is in order to complete its transition, if I >> understand everything right. > > Your subsequent mails suggest you might already know this, but: > > gnucash (2.0.1-2 to 2.0.1-3) > Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG > Too young, only 8 of 10 days old > out of date on m68k: gnucash (from 1.8.10-19) (but m68k isn't keeping up, > so nevermind) > Not considered > Depends: gnucash dbus > Depends: gnucash libofx > Depends: gnucash fontconfig (not considered) > > not going anywhere until fontconfig and, subsequently, dbus, are ready; and > then it needs to go in together with dbus.
Um, the new gnucash does depend on the new libofx. But the converse is *not* true. According to what I can see: * Updating libofx makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on i386: grisbi, kmymoney2 * grisbi is waiting for libofx * kmymoney2 is waiting for libaqbanking, libofx * Updating libaqbanking makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on arm: kmymoney2, qbankmanager * qbankmanager is waiting for libaqbanking All these packages are built and sufficiently aged to transition, and as far as I can tell, this is the complete dependency graph. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
