On Thu 2018-07-12 11:25:58 -0400, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
> is useful for all the packages that depend on it.
> The debdiff from the previous version in stretch is not attached because it 
> was being rejected as spam.
> This proposed release is also available at the
> "publicsuffix_debian/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1" tag on the "debian/stretch" 
> branch at
> the git repo for publicsuffix packaging:
>     https://salsa.debian.org/debian/publicsuffix
> Please followup on this ticket to confirm whether I should upload this
> revision to stretch.

I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug report,
and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with this

 <903...@bugs.debian.org>: host buxtehude.debian.org[] said: 550
     malware detected: Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.db3039.UNOFFICIAL: message rejected
     (in reply to end of DATA command)

Since that's failing, i'll just post it publicly on the web.  You can
retrieve the debdiff at:


It has a sha256sum of:


Apologies for the inconvenience.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to