On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:39:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Seamonkey 1.1 is not yet in the archive, but is being worked on at the > > > moment and should be uploaded some day soon (well, a 1.1a package). But > > > Seamonkey 1.0 not being in the archive makes it easy for us to just > > > decide to not include Seamonkey at all.
> > Sorry, what do you mean by "decide to not include Seamonkey at all"? > That if it's not suitable for release, we can just not release it. > Though, that leaves mozilla-browser users unsupported in etch. Where does the conclusion come from that it's not suitable for release? This is the first I've heard of it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
