Your message dated Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:30:36 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#911631: nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3
has caused the Debian Bug report #911631,
regarding nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
911631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
This is a second follow-up to my previous request binnmu request:
https://bugs.debian.org/910549
Since then, packagesearch 2.7.10 was uploaded to unstable with amd64
binaries built against an out-of-date xapian-core (1.4.7-2, rather
than 1.4.7-4 which fixed the issue that required these binNMUs).
nmu packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against libxapian30 with
dependency in shlibs'
dw packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'libxapian-dev (>= 1.4.7-4)'
Cheers,
Olly
P.S. for the maintainer of packagesearch: Ben, please ensure your build
chroot is up-to-date (it must have been 2 weeks or more out of date for
this to happen). Also, there's no need to be uploading binaries unless
the package needs to go through NEW (which would also have avoided this
happening in this case) - see: https://wiki.debian.org/SourceOnlyUpload
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 22/10/2018 21:45, Olly Betts wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> This is a second follow-up to my previous request binnmu request:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/910549
>
> Since then, packagesearch 2.7.10 was uploaded to unstable with amd64
> binaries built against an out-of-date xapian-core (1.4.7-2, rather
> than 1.4.7-4 which fixed the issue that required these binNMUs).
>
> nmu packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against libxapian30 with
> dependency in shlibs'
> dw packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'libxapian-dev (>= 1.4.7-4)'
Scheduled.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
