On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:47:20PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > The author states that "the package is under GPLv2"
> The author at least stated (in the bug log) that he's going to clean up > the licensing, and it's going to be either GPL or LPPL. I guess GPL, > since that seems to be the more recent choice. No matter which of them, > this bug should be kept open, but get a sarge-ignore tag. RMs, will you > do that? This bug is marked as "important" and therefore doesn't need an -ignore tag? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
