Your message dated Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:29:06 +0000
with message-id <1549794546.8680.13.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#919585: RM: node-groove/2.5.0-4 -- RoM; FTBFS;
orphaned; abandoned upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #919585,
regarding RM: node-groove/2.5.0-4 -- RoM; FTBFS; orphaned; abandoned upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
919585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Note that groovebasin is already removed from testing.
Thanks
Jérémy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 00:41 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
> Le dim. 10 févr. 2019 à 00:14, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org
> .uk> a écrit :
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 16:26 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: rm
> > >
> > > Note that groovebasin is already removed from testing.
> >
> > So where are/were you requesting removal from?
>
> The idea was to remove node-groove from testing and the only software
> using it was groovebasin, which was already removed.
> Maybe even from unstable since the situation for that software is not
> going to improve.
> And the message i wrote wasn't explicit enough, sorry about that.
Fair enough. It looks like node-groove is no longer in any suite above
stable, so this request has ended up being completed in any case.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
