On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > * have m68k be in unstable, and have it have its own "testing-like"
> > suite of some description
> > + keeps the arch alive
> > - some work to keep m68k-testing in sync with real testing needed
> > - doesn't have real releases
> > - may not have security support
> Is it possible to run britney multiple times, the first time for all
> releasable arches, and the following runs for each other arch, but
> commit changes to etch/$arch?
> For example, this would permit releasing an etch/m68k without a
> separate archive.
> Perhaps the maintenance of the testing propagation of m68k alone should
> then be made by m68k porters instead of the *release* team.
Finally a good proposal... thx! :)
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
