On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 05:12:06PM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:04:15PM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > I don't understand. You're saying the RC bugs it has should be marked as > > not-for-etch, but the package itself is also not for etch? Why? > > The RC bugs currently filed against ikvm are listed as applying only to the > > version of ikvm in unstable. Is there reason to believe they also apply to > > the version in testing? Are there other reasons why the version of ikvm in > > testing is unreleasable? > The ikvm in testing (0.18.0.0-2) managed to get compiled and built at some > point in the past. Since then, the mono compiler and runtimes have moved on > so that the version in testing won't compile (FTBFS). When the runtime and > compiler changes below the application, it can't be detected. Ok, gotcha. Tagged for removal. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
