On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:32:38PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:29:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > I already discussed this with Dann Frazier (bcc:ed), who said doing > > > security > > > support for fai-kernels is no problem. (After all, it's just adding a > > > changelog entry and rebuilding the package once a new > > > linux-source-$version > > > is available.)
> > > So I have one question: should I *now* (let someone) upload a new version > > > of > > > fai-kernels with build-depends on linux-source-2.6.18 and then open a RC > > > bug > > > to prevent it from migrating to etch? > > > Or should I wait with an upload until 2.6.18 has entered etch? I fear > > > that the > > > freeze will happen then... Though as there are no big changes in > > > fai-kernels > > > planned, I think a review of fai-kernels is painless. > > I guess the latter is preferred, 2.6.18 seems really close to entering > > testing > > really soon. But that's mostly up to Dann, he should know best. > I would think that this package wouldn't flow into etch w/o the needed > build-deps, so I don't think the explicit RC bug is necessary (will > let the release guys correct me if I'm wrong). That is wrong; britney doesn't honor build-depends when updating packages in testing. > I think getting a 2.6.18 fai into sid ASAP is a good idea. I agree, I don't see any reason to wait (or even to file an RC bug, since everyone knows 2.6.18 will be pushed into etch before release). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
