An update to this: On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I would like to update libgpod in unstable. This would include both > a soname change and a -dev package name change.
After testing all the reverse dependencies we can probably drop the -dev name change since all seem to be either unaffected by the API changes or deal with it gracefully. > Luckily the list of packages affected is pretty small (but the packages > on it are somewhat big ;) > > amarok > rhythmbox > gtkpod > listen (?) -- honestly don't know wether this needs updating since > it uses the library through the python bindings Anyway, I've decided to wait for a fixed upstream version since I will not through the hassle to create a version with a debian specific soname. If someone deems this worthwile, I would reconsider if I get a complete and tested patch for that. Waiting for the new upstream version means it will not be interesting for etch (AFAICT from the release updates and upstream's release frequency). Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
