On 2006-11-21 Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of my packages, SDLjump, has been renamed upstream to GNUjump (since it > became part of the GNU project). However, there has not been a release of the > renamed version, and it may take some time before that happens (a few months, > I think).
> SDLjump is not in Sarge. Is it a good idea to rename the package now, so that > the package name in Etch will be gnujump, and no transition is needed when > Etch+1 (sorry I forgot the name) is released? Or should I just wait for an > upstream release, and package that after Etch is out? How about simply adding "This package is going to be renamed to GNUjump" to the package description? This way apt-cache search will find it. cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects, howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
