Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 01:25 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
>>> The python team has apparently decreed that python 2.3 will not be in
>>> etch.  This forces every package to use the new version.  Surely it is
>>> too late in the release cycle to be risking regressions in this way?
> 
>> please could you provide details why you think this causes
>> regressions?
> 
> gnucash 2.0.2-2 built without failures on arm, and every other arch.
> 
> gnucash 2.0.2-2.1, your NMU, fails to build on arm.  This is known as a
> "regression", and the obvious explanation is that your change may be
> responsible.  Distressingly, you have declared it "not your problem", so
> after making an unannounced NMU, of a non-RC issue, you now proceed to
> disclaim any responsibility for what you broke.  Splendid.

This is not a regression, the build failure comes from the build daemon.
For a few weeks, the arm build daemon called "netwinder" fails to build
every package that uses /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.6.

gnucash is now built on arm and is in the archive.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to