On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:14:51AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please consider for testing: > > gcc-4.1: > > 4.1.1ds2-20 is for four weeks in the archive without regressions > report to the BTS, -21 fixes important bugs for non-release archs. > Maybe Lucas could rebuild the testing archive with the -20 or -21 > packages before letting theis version into testing. > > gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds2-21) unstable; urgency=high > > * Enable -pthread for GNU/Hurd (Michael Banck). Closes: #400031. > * Update the m68k-fpcompare patch (Roman Zippel). Closes: #401585. > > -- Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:35:06 +0100 > > gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds2-20) unstable; urgency=low > > [Matthias Klose] > * Update to SVN 20061115. > - Fix PR tree-optimization/27891, ICE in tree_split_edge. > Closes: #370248, #391657, #394630. > - Fix PR tree-optimization/9814, duplicate of PR tree-optimization/29797. > Closes: #181096. > * Apply the libjava/net backport from the redhat/gcc-4_1-branch. > * Apply proposed patch for PR java/29805.
I suggest we approve it because at this point it is more likely there are packages in Etch that FTBFS with -19 than packages in Etch that FTBFS with -21 since -20/-21 were used to build packages that went to Etch. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
