On 2006-12-26 14:11:39 +0100 Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 11:59:55 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote: >> hello >> >>>> is it possible to let this version go into testing. >>>> it improves the font in many ways, here's the upstream >>>> changelog: >>> >>> I'm not keen to unblock it as it's a new upstream version with lots >of >>> >changes... >> >> i am keen to have it unblocked. i trust upstream, i have tested upstream, >> i say it's good. i wouldn't ask you to unblock it if i wasn't sure of the >> equal-to-better quality of the current version. > > 10 files changed, 184914 insertions(+), 7850 deletions(-) > > To go a little bit into more details: > + Upstream Changelog removed > + Many docs removed > + New tex documents added > > And i see NO changes that are RC. What needs to be fixed for that > package in Etch? > > Do you REALLY think this is a valid candidate to be unblock? I don't > think so. Yes I REALLY REALLY think so. WOULD I ELSE ASK FOR IT? oh well do whatever you want. > Greetings > Martin
