On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:55:15PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Sunday 24 December 2006 00:31, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This still does not respect certain local changes by the admin. Just > > because the link in /etc/rc2.d has been left alone doesn't mean that the > > symlinks for *all* the runlevels have been left alone.
> Thats true, but if anybody changed there stuff, he should be able to handle > also this. But a hint in NEWS.Debian would be a nice idea. That's not the point. It's a policy violation because it overrides the admin's deliberate configuration changes. "The admin can fix it" doesn't excuse that the user will be left *having* to identify this issue and fix it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
