On Thursday 28 December 2006 09:38, Wookey wrote: > On 2006-12-26 17:44 +0000, Olly Betts wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:28:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: [...] > > > > * Reupload the package as something like 1.0.39.1-1 (or 1.0.39.1 and > > > > fix the package to be non-native later when we aren't trying to > > > > release etch). I am the upstream for survex, so I can ensure there's > > > > never an upstream release called 1.0.39.1. > > > > > > What about 1.0.39+upstream-1 or something similar? > > > > Well, there's nothing upstream specific here either! But it does the > > job so I'm happy to go with it, assuming Wookey (cc:-ed) is. > > The +ver syntax is reserved for binNMU's - right? So this suggestion > is to build an hppa version from the new sources and compatible with > them then upload it with 1.0.39+b2 (or +upstream-1) which will sort > higher than the exsiting one and become installable?
I'm not following the thread, but foo+bar is allowed for a source version, as for amsn, for example. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
