On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:11:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 29 December 2006 19:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Note that option (3) depends on upstream's ability to fix the problem > > quickly, *and* is likely to be error prone. If our priority is the > > *release*, then options (1) and (2) are the best choices.
> I miss an analysis of what other packages are involved in this plan. If > only GnuCash is involved that'd make the lower ranked options more of an > option than if the number of affected packages is unknown or expected to > be large. The number of affected packages is unknown. AFAIK, prior to the bug being filed on gnucash it was assumed to be zero. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
