Mike Hommey wrote: > Could you explain why qemu should add the device for something that is > remotely in relationship with it ?
Remotely? I think qemu and kqemu are quite close. Besides that this is definitely off-topic here, I agree that a package in main should not make a compromise to support a package in non-free if it is bad for the package in main. However, that kqemu is in non-free should not be a reason against creating of just a device node in qemu. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
