On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:30:39PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >> Sure, but python2.5 is not really usable: almost all the python modules a= > > re > >> compiled only for python2.4. For postgresql you are right and I'm wrong, > >> but I suppose that there are other examples in the archive where the only= > > a > >> major release is released. > >>=20 > >> Anyway, my question still applies. :) > >>=20 > > That got me wondering and it appears that Etch will ship with Apache > > 1.3.34? Why? It is considered a legacy release by ASF? Is the Debian > > security team really willing to support it for another 2-3 years? > If you have a large webserver farm / custom modules for Apache / your third party application has hooks into Apache 1.3, you may still want it. Apache 2 will be what many will install: it may be useful to retain the choice.
> The same goes for bind8, only that I didn't receive a > sustantial reply at all... Again: if your infrastructure / expertise is in BIND 8 and you can't afford to move? For some small group of users that may be reason enough. Andy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
