Hi Sebastian On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:58, Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Is that really worth the effort for this one missing symbol? I'd just > make sure that is stays around regardless of glibc version.
There was a patch proposed in the corresponding Ubuntu bug [1], re-introducing the symbol, however there was a concern from schopin (see comment #4): > This patch wouldn't work as intended, as we'd mix arc4random functions > from the vendored sources and from glibc, > each set having their own internal static data. A test rebuild of reverse-dependencies was done in Ubuntu, and the transition went ahead. Regards Graham [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/libevent/+bug/1990941
