On 2022-11-07 20:57:44 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-11-07 11:44:31 +0100, Graham Inggs wrote: > > Hi Sebastian > > > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:58, Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Is that really worth the effort for this one missing symbol? I'd just > > > make sure that is stays around regardless of glibc version. > > > > There was a patch proposed in the corresponding Ubuntu bug [1], > > re-introducing the symbol, however there was a concern from schopin > > (see comment #4): > > > > > This patch wouldn't work as intended, as we'd mix arc4random functions > > > from the vendored sources and from glibc, > > > each set having their own internal static data. > > So let's use the glibc provided one over the internal copy. I don't see > the issue. With the rather non-trivial set of libevent reverse > dependencies, I'd like to avoid a lock step transition.
Please ignore my mail. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
