Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:04:33 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024675: transition: openturns
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024675,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1024675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024675
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to do the transition of openturns due to ABI changes. The new
version is in experimental and builds on all relevant architectures. There is
one rdep, persalys, which also builds well.
The autogenerated ben file is fine.
So I am ready to proceed when you tell me.
Cheers,
--
Pierre Gruet
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-11-23 09:43:58 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2022-11-23 06:02:59 +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear Release Team,
> >
> > I would like to do the transition of openturns due to ABI changes. The new
> > version is in experimental and builds on all relevant architectures. There
> > is
> > one rdep, persalys, which also builds well.
> >
> > The autogenerated ben file is fine.
> >
> > So I am ready to proceed when you tell me.
>
> Please go ahead.
The old packages got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
