On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The codebase is the same as the one for iceape and icedove currently in > > unstable... the only difference is the way it is linked altogether in a > > single big dynamic library instead of a single big binary program. > > Yeah, I've done some test builds now of xulrunner on my alpha, and this > isn't a regression in xulrunner; it's either a regression in the toolchain, > or a change in some underlying lib that trips the already known bug in > binutils on alpha causing link times to scale poorly with the number of > symbols.
... what uploads might have caused this regression? > > So the only fix needed here is to raise the timeouts on the buildd for > iceweasel, iceape, icedove, and xulrunner to an obscene number. Sorry for my ignorance, but would this timeout-fix mean that builds for alpha will take ages in future (e.g. when building security uploads)? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
