-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21-01-2007, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:38:20PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > >> On 14-01-2007, Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-1i to unstable. The former version >> > (0.5.1-3) has an important bugs, that this new upstream release fix. I >> > attach the diff between the two version. >> > >> > The difference is : >> > * Upstream correction of bug (#406711: libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev: undefined >> > reference to `ml_gsl_sf_legendre_array_size_e' when building top level >> > * Use of ocaml.mk (shipped in ocaml package). >> > >> > Since the upstream correction solved a bug of severity important i think >> > it should be good to correct this for etch. >> > >> > Dependency in etch are enough for this new package. > >> As suggested, i have rebuild a package 0.5.2-0etch1 which doesn't have >> the "build system maintainance". Now it includes only the new upstream >> release. > >> I would like to upload this package to testing-proposed-update. > >> Is this OK ? > > Testing-proposed-updates is intended for RC bugfixes, and definitely not for > new upstream releases. If you want to see this fix included in etch, please > provide a package via unstable that includes the important bugfixes without > the build system reorg, and reintroduce the build system changes after it's > been accepted into etch. >
I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-2 to unstable which only contains the new upstream version (same diff as with 0.5.2-0etch1 given previously). Regards, Sylvain Le Gall -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFs6B7ir2bofsN/psRAp6BAJ0YJ2h71l7ENFd5weVlfXUJxy4fVwCfSKVC VjxnD9eVu0+pPKagMyqn3jE= =p8xE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
