On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 10:57:56AM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi! > > > That is the correct interpretation, but you missed the second half: > > > > > > You have the wrong version there though. > > > > That is a reference to: > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:09:30AM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 09:33, Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > We also have a lack of dbgsym packages, probably because of the > > > > maintainer > > > > upload of amd64 and all. I'd quite like to fix the second lintian > > > > warning > > > > at least; if you uploaded again now with the more conventional version > > > > of > > > > 1:10.11.4-1~deb12u1 do you have to go through NEW again or could you > > > > make > > > > it a source-only upload? > > I still don't understand - do you mean the 'version' as in contents of > the package, or 'version' as in version string 1:10.11.4-1~deb12u1 > should be something else? > > Please advice and I will reupload this weekend.
I'm just looking for a source upload of the agreed changes with a version string of something conventional like 1:10.11.4-1~deb12u1, targetting bookworm. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
