On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:43:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > > > Given all this, would still be possible to consider this for etch ?
> > ...which would require another round of main and non-free conglomeration > > packages in NEW, together with removals in testing and unstable of the > > non-free ones. Don't know if we can make this happen as it's not > > depending on me. > Well, what does -release have to say about this? Not a high priority. We might look at it for etch once uploaded, if the changes are reasonable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
