Your message dated Mon, 5 Feb 2024 11:17:43 +0100
with message-id <zcc1xy9d24hpd...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061071: transition: libcamera 0.2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061071,
regarding transition: libcamera 0.2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1061071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:libcamera
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.2.0.
The auto-generated ben tracker looks good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html
The unique reverse dep (pipewire 1.0.1-1) builds fine with
2 upstream patches [1], since they break the backward
compatibility, I plan to do an upload of pipewire once libcamera0.2
is in unstable.
Thanks,
Dylan
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/pipewire/-/commit/a48d3473
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-01-23 10:49:29 +0100, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Le dim. 21 janv. 2024 à 16:56, Sebastian Ramacher
> <sramac...@debian.org> a écrit :
> >
> > > Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.2.0.
> >
> > Please go ahead.
> >
>
> Thanks!
>
> Both libcamera 0.2 and pipewire were uploaded to unstable yesterday.
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
