Your message dated Thu, 2 May 2024 23:39:05 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061645: poco: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061645,
regarding transition: poco
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1061645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061645
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 poco
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-poco.html
poco is available in experimental with the libraries' SOVERSIONs at 100.
This transition is from SOVERSION 80.
The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-02 22:45:57 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> This has essentially happened because I have accidentally uploaded to
> unstable.
> The only reverse dependency that still depends on the old SONAME is
> clickhouse, which FTBFS due to unrelated issues.
> I think this can be closed.
It is not in testing anyway. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
