Hi Jérémie, On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:44:25AM +0100, Jérémie Corbier wrote: > A new version of wide-dhcpv6 has been uploaded to unstable a few days ago. > Could > you please let it enter etch?
> Changelog entry: > wide-dhcpv6 (20061016-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * debian/control: added lsb-base as a dependency. Why are you adding this as a dependency? Is this currently a /missing/ dependency? There's nothing else in the diff that explains why this would be added. > * debian/patches: > -> Added 01_bugfixes_20061227.dpatch: > + Bug fixes from CVS 20061227. > + dhcp6relay accepts Unique Local IPv6 unicast Addresses. > + Fix an IA allocation failure from pool in dhcp6s. > + Fix "-P" option in dhcp6s. None of which appear to be major problems in the package today? > -> Updated 02_Makefile.in.dpatch. Which is a rename of an earlier patch, making review more time-consuming; and parts of the original patch are apparently merged upstream (and the rest is redundant in light of dh_fixperms). This doesn't look like a candidate for a freeze exception to me. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
