Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103162,
regarding nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1103162: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103162
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-04-17 23:21:05 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:41:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > >
> > > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > User: [email protected]
> > > > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > > >
> > > > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
> > > > > librdkit-dev"
> > > >
> > > > Why is this needed?
> > >
> > > The autopkgtests fail:
> > >
> > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/
> > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/59906919/
> >
> > If symbols go missing from librdkit, this smells like a SONAME bump that
> > is missing from librdkit.
>
> Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to
> rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g.
> we could remove the shared library.
It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild. Please make sure that
librdkit1t64 gains a Breaks on the old version of coot.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
