Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to > > > rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g. > > > we could remove the shared library. > > > > It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild. Please make sure that > > librdkit1t64 gains a Breaks on the old version of coot. > > This still needs to happen. As I scheduled the autopkgtest combination to > quickly in reply to bug 1103579 (which was CC-ed to the RT) rdkit is now > blocked by an explicit block hint by me. Please let us know when the Breaks > is added.
I've just uploaded rdkit_202503.1-3 with a Breaks: coot (<< 1.1.15+dfsg-1) for librdkit1t64. Michael
