On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:02:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > OTOH, there seems to be fairly little user testing here; none of the > > iceape-l10n-* packages have more than 15 users registered with popcon. So > > I'm reluctant to unblock such packages which could have significant negative > > impact on the user's browser if bugs are hiding.
> Having maintained iceweasel-l10n for a while now, would it be of any > effect for you wrt/ its etch migration if I would had a look at the > iceape-l10n (*not* ment ironic: I don't feel offended if you say no)? Are the iceape and iceweasel l10n APIs identical? Are the contents of the packages identical? I'm pretty sure the answer is "no"; so information about iceweasel doesn't really translate to assurance about the iceape versions. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
