On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > At 248kloc, this is far from being a targetted security fix.
> Yes I know. The reason why I propose to update it is that the > version currently in testing is a bit "shaky" and the proposed version > is much more stable. At least that it is so from my testing and also > from the testing upstream. > It also look bigger than it is because I had to regenerate the patch > against the source tree. > The kernel patch do not affect any other package, so I can not see that > accepting this package will block anything else. The most it can do > is to create a RC bug on itself. On the other hand it is more likely > that we get RC bugs on the current version in testing, than on this > more stable version (028.18). > I have built the kernel on all supported architectures and done the > same kind of target testing as have been done on all other versions. > stop, start, heavy io etc. Unblocked. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
