On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:27:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > At 248kloc, this is far from being a targetted security fix. > > > Yes I know. The reason why I propose to update it is that the > > version currently in testing is a bit "shaky" and the proposed version > > is much more stable. At least that it is so from my testing and also > > from the testing upstream. > > > It also look bigger than it is because I had to regenerate the patch > > against the source tree. > > > The kernel patch do not affect any other package, so I can not see that > > accepting this package will block anything else. The most it can do > > is to create a RC bug on itself. On the other hand it is more likely > > that we get RC bugs on the current version in testing, than on this > > more stable version (028.18). > > > I have built the kernel on all supported architectures and done the > > same kind of target testing as have been done on all other versions. > > stop, start, heavy io etc. > > Unblocked.
Thanks a lot! Regards, // Ola > Thanks, > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ > -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ---- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]